Mouth to mouth
What can a frog mouth tell us about human birth defects and evolution?
As early embryos, humans bear a striking resemblance
to frogs. Both species comprise three
basic cell types, arranged in the same general pattern.
And that isn’t
surprising, considering we evolved from a common ancestor.
But where does the likeness end? The jury is still out on which developmental
processes we share.
“Our wild and crazy idea is that animals as different as sea
urchins and humans use the same biological mechanisms to organize their
heads,” says Whitehead Member Hazel
Sive.
Her lab is beginning to test this idea in the frog, Xenopus,
which is easy to study, and whose mouth is very similar to the human
mouth.
Once researchers understand this animal, they will look at other organisms,
including more primitive animals whose heads comprise just a hollow cylinder
of cells, to compare processes.
Slice a frog embryo approximately 12 hours after it is fertilized and
you’ll see three layers—endoderm, mesoderm and ectoderm—which
eventually give rise to all of the animal’s tissues.
But the extreme front end (anterior) of the embryo lacks mesoderm, (the
middle layer), just comprising the ectoderm and endoderm. Human embryos
exhibit the same pattern.
In the most primitive animals, there is no mesoderm anywhere in the
animal. Sive thinks that the lack of mesoderm in the extreme front of
higher animals is a relic of ancient evolutionary processes, and a persistence
of a process that occurred in the most primitive animals.
Sive hopes her research will yield clues about evolution. “This
idea isn’t in any developmental biology textbooks yet, but the
position of the cells at the front of all animal embryos is remarkably
similar,” she says.
The similarity of mouth formation in frogs and humans also will shed
light on the mechanisms behind human craniofacial birth defects.
Such defects, which range from cleft palates to underdeveloped jaws,
account for three-fourths of all structural birth defects, according
to the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research. Cleft
palates alone afflict roughly 8,000 newborns in the United States each
year.
If frogs and humans use the same genetic circuitry to control formation
of the mouth and head, then scientists might be able to apply findings
from one species to the other. That’s one reason Sive’s lab
is studying mouth development in the frog.
How to make a mouth
Postdoctoral researcher Amanda Dickinson managed to map the steps required
to make the primary mouth, the first opening to form in the embryo, and
published her results last July in the journal Developmental Biology.
The primary mouth connects the gut to the outside and allows feeding.
At a later stage, the secondary mouth—which includes the jaws,
teeth and tongue—grows around this hole, allowing organisms to
chew.
“We think the primary mouth might play a major role in positioning
other parts of the face, which is one of the reasons it’s critical
to understand how this initial opening forms,” says Sive.
Although other labs had studied particular aspects of primary mouth
development in a variety of model organisms, Dickinson was the first
to tie this work together in a single critter. Further, she is the first
to approach this process using molecular tools, with the ability to identify
the genes involved.
Dickinson traced the movement of individual cells as a frog embryo’s
gut tube poked through to the outside world (see the
image series to the right). Initially, the endoderm
cells at the end of the gut tube are encased by ectoderm.
The endoderm and ectoderm are kept separate by a basement
membrane between them. This basement membrane begins
to disappear where the hole is destined to form, an
oddity in biological terms.
 |
|
Amanda Dickinson, shown here with Whitehead Member Hazel Sive, was inspired
to probe the connections between species after playing with animals in
Nova Scotia tide pools as a child.
Photo: Kim Furnald
|
“Normally, the endoderm and ectoderm never mix,” says Sive. “As
the basement membrane breaks down, these layers have to overcome their
hatred of one another.”
The sworn enemies grow flexible as the materials between them disappear.
In fact, the endoderm and ectoderm lose so much of their stiffness that
they cave toward the center of the embryo, forming a dimple on its surface.
“At around the same time, the two layers begin to mix, which is
truly remarkable,” says Dickinson. “It’s as if you
shuffled two decks of playing cards.”
As endoderm and ectoderm cells mix, some of them begin to die. The mixed
mass grows thinner and thinner until it’s just a single layer of
cells. Finally, this layer, which is stretched thin like the membrane
of a balloon, pops open in the middle, producing the primary mouth. Dickinson
and postdoc Colin DeBakker are now working to pinpoint the networks of
genes that control each step of this process.
“The animal would have real problems if holes started appearing
all over the body, so we’re interested in the genetic circuitry
that coordinates formation of just the right size hole in just the right
place,” says Sive.
Cementing evolution
New genetic analyses tie into other work in the Sive lab on the extreme
anterior region of embryos.
Postdoc Shuhong Li concentrates on the genes and proteins that control
a much simpler organ—the cement gland, which sits just below the
primary mouth. Sive likens this organ to an underwater Post-it note,
which secrets mucus to help frog embryos stick to solid surfaces so they
won’t be washed away. The Sive lab has pioneered use of the cement
gland as a “marker” for the extreme anterior of the embryo.
Humans lack cement glands, but many aquatic vertebrates depend on them
for survival. A cement gland consists of just one layer of cells, so
it is easy to study. Li and others have identified many of the proteins
that turn on the genes that make the cement gland. Li is building a detailed
genetic circuit diagram that describes how this organ is positioned at
the extreme anterior.
“My job is to isolate the factors that control which genes are
expressed in the region, and more and more evidence shows that some of
these regulatory mechanisms play a role in multiple organs and multiple
species, perhaps even humans,” he says.
Thus Li’s analysis might help Dickinson and DeBakker unravel the
factors that control primary mouth formation in frogs and shed light on
the interactions between genes and proteins in humans. And the Sive lab’s
studies highlight how basic research on seemingly esoteric organs or systems
can yield information that aids human biomedical research.
| Written by Alyssa Kneller with
contributions by David Cameron. |
|